October 27th, 2009 12:46am

Big Mac, hitting coach; why not?

by OldSchool

At first glance, the St. Louis Cardinals’ hiring of Mark McGwire as hitting coach seems odd for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the fact that Big Mac had a career batting average of .263 over 17 seasons. By contrast, the man he replaces, Hal McRae, had a .290 batting average over 19 seasons.

But it might not be so odd. To McGwire’s credit, he hit 583 homers. So if nothing else, he’s qualified to teach home-run hitting. And his on-base percentage of .394 is 43 points higher than McRae’s.

Besides, some of the most notable hitting coaches weren’t great hitters themselves. Just two examples:

Charlie Lau, George Brett’s guru with the Kansas City Royals of the 1970s and 1980s (and, incidentally, McRae’s hitting coach, too), had a .255 career average over 11 major-league seasons.

Jim Lefebvre, who has been a hitting coach and has even authored five books about hitting, batted .251 over an eight-season career.

Maybe the Cardinals’ choice of McGwire as batting coach isn’t all that odd, after all.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Category Uncategorized

Comments

1 Comment

  1. October 27th, 2009 2:07 pm

    Why not? His first steroid free season (he purportedly started with straight testosterone his rookie season) he hit under .200.
    He also struck out an average of 115 times per season, low by today’s standards (40% more that Bonds however)
    LaRussa will do his best to keep Big Mac away from reporters, who may have the gumption to ask questions he refused to answer while in front of Congress.

    by Cara


Submit Your Comments

Required

Required, will not be published